tags 227997 - pending stop quit I didn't apply anything to the debian tree therefor this bug is not pending.
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Carl Johnstone wrote: > Fabio: > > I am also dowgrading the bug since the apache still serves the pages > > correctly and it does not die completly (only the child is killed but > > respawned immediatly). > > The child dies, but no content is returned on that child request. If you > have the module turned on for all pages (as I have) then your http > server effectively becomes useless. It does return pages to me. I would have wrote that otherwise. > > For users whose setup depends on this module (as mine does) then the > severity of the bug is effectively grave. > I realise that there are a lot > of users who don't use the module and are therefore not affected by the > bug, the documentation for the BTS suggests to me that important is the > correct severity for this type of bug. >rant> As a user point of view every single bug in this world is grave. No.. i do not agree but i will leave as is now since i am tired to play ping-pong with the BTS. A single optional command for a module is only a very small part of the entire apache package. it does not corrupt fs or it doesn't introduce any security hole so grave is unacceptable. important is still questionable. anyway </rant> let's keep this stuff out of the BTS since they are irrelevant to the bug. Fabio -- Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol "We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp00004.html
