Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:12:31 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#230165: -7 in incoming
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2004 23:36:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 28 15:36:01 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (extern.mail.waldi.eu.org)
[82.139.196.55] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AlzE0-0003ni-00; Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:36:01 -0800
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 269B93C080; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:35:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:35:56 +0100
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libapr0 - libaprutil don't links against libdb4.2
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level:
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: libapr0
Version: 2.0.48-5
Severity: serious
libaprutil.so.0 uses libdb4.2 but don't links against them.
Bastian
--=20
Deflector shields just came on, Captain.
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkAYR1wACgkQLkAIIn9ODhG+bQCg1F3AieXcYuoV4l9JLLtgKJDa
R1wAoN6IQkb5nc1CHIUEcpNzJF2kTXTg
=B4bd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 230165-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2004 12:12:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 31 04:12:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk (trider-g7.fabbione.net)
[212.242.169.198]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AmtzG-0001jd-00; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 04:12:35 -0800
Received: from trider-g7.ext.fabbione.net (port5.ds1-sby.adsl.cybercity.dk
[212.242.169.198])
by trider-g7.fabbione.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC0116;
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:12:31 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:12:31 +0100 (CET)
From: Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#230165: -7 in incoming
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_27
X-Spam-Level:
Bastian,
thanks for your fast reply. I am closing the bug.
Fabio
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 08:21:09AM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > hi Bastian,
> > we just uploaded -7 that should fix this problem. According to ldd
> > output:
> >
> > libaprutil.so.0:
> > libdb-4.2.so => /usr/lib/libdb-4.2.so (0x40067000)
> >
> > Please can you confirm that everything is working as it should?
>
> Seems to work fine.
>
> Bastian
>
>
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol
"We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues
http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp00004.html
