Alle 17:41, sabato 14 ottobre 2006, Tollef Fog Heen ha scritto: > > [.. ] asking to have > > /proc installed have only meanings of "current system" installs, not a > > generic one. So this bug is valid for all packages that requires /proc to > > finish the installation.
> Then you should build in a UML or Xen instance or something similar > which is as close to a generic system as possible. This is a nice advice and will permits to spot "bug" similar to that one, thanks I will look at this issue after etch. > > If I dig maintainers scripts and provide a patch, could that be > > integrated asap or will just be a useless effort by me? > I don't think you can, given that the way it currently works is by > design. This sentence is exactly clear to me, that means that such a patch will not be considered? > If we can't determine whether port 80 is in use or not, we > assume it is. So if /proc is not mounted you could just assume that port 80 is free and do not fail the installation of package will be possible? -- ESC:wq
pgpHwErtrSfmk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
