Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:26:32 +0200
with message-id <201204142126.32783...@sfritsch.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#605123: apache2.2-common: "incorrect" definitions of
Common Log Format and Combined Log Format
has caused the Debian Bug report #605123,
regarding apache2.2-common: "incorrect" definitions of Common Log Format and
Combined Log Format
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
605123: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605123
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apache2.2-common
Version: 2.2.16-4
Severity: minor
Hi.
In the apache2.conf you make some predefined log-formats, including one for
the Common Log Format and one for the Combined Log Format.
Those are defined there using %O for the number of bytes.
Most other resources I could find (e.g. Apache documentation and W3C) use %b
however
or defined this to be the size of the document being transmitted (therefore
without the Header stuff).
Althoug I personally also prefer the total raw size (and therfore %O) I'd
suggest
to use %b here, to be _absolutely_ compatible to everything else.
Cheers,
Chris.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Saturday 27 November 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> In the apache2.conf you make some predefined log-formats, including
> one for the Common Log Format and one for the Combined Log Format.
>
> Those are defined there using %O for the number of bytes.
> Most other resources I could find (e.g. Apache documentation and
> W3C) use %b however or defined this to be the size of the document
> being transmitted (therefore without the Header stuff).
>
>
> Althoug I personally also prefer the total raw size (and therfore
> %O) I'd suggest to use %b here, to be _absolutely_ compatible to
> everything else.
We had that in the past. The problem with %b is that it gives no
indication if the request was a partial request but always logs the
size of the complete document. I think that the inaccuracies because
of the headers are smaller than inaccuracies because of
partial requests, and that %O is more useful in general. Therefore, I
close this bug as wontfix.
--- End Message ---
