Hi, On 21.09.2013 23:27, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > That would be a rather large piece of work. It would be incompatible > with basically all apache modules and web-app packages in wheezy, so > those would need backporting, too. Considering that there is still > plenty of work to do in jessie, I don't think a backport will happen > anytime soon.
I do not think this will _ever_ happen. An Apache 2.4 backport would trigger a massive chain of reverse dependencies which need a backport, too (we talk about 250+ packages here). This is a massive change of Wheezy which is not conforming to backport policies. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature