Package: apache2
Version: 2.4.57-2
Followup-For: Bug #1068412

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
Security Updates in unstable are not propagated to stable
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?A
Waited for the update to arrive in bookworm

   * What was the outcome of this action?
Well it's not there after almost two weeks
   * What outcome did you expect instead?
...

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***

Apparently there are build issues in sid (maybe due to t64 migration).
However that is not a problem in bookworm and after.

Please consider to work around the issues and have a fix for "normal users". 
Ubuntu has provided the update to 2.4.59 last week already.

Thank you!
 
Bets regards

Peter

PS: below is only one of my systems. arm64, amd64 and armhf all miss this 
update!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-18-arm64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages apache2 depends on:
pn  apache2-bin                <none>
pn  apache2-data               <none>
pn  apache2-utils              <none>
ii  init-system-helpers        1.65.2
ii  lsb-base                   11.6
ii  media-types                10.0.0
ii  perl                       5.36.0-7+deb12u1
ii  procps                     2:4.0.2-3
ii  sysvinit-utils [lsb-base]  3.06-4

Versions of packages apache2 recommends:
ii  ssl-cert  1.1.2

Versions of packages apache2 suggests:
pn  apache2-doc                                      <none>
pn  apache2-suexec-pristine | apache2-suexec-custom  <none>
pn  www-browser                                      <none>

Reply via email to