debian-arm  

Messages by Date

• 2024/08/04 Re: Multiple failure for nodejs unrelated packages on armel Bastien Roucariès
• 2024/08/04 Re: Multiple failure for nodejs unrelated packages on armel Jérémy Lal
• 2024/08/04 Re: Multiple failure for nodejs unrelated packages on armel Jérémy Lal
• 2024/08/04 Multiple failure for nodejs unrelated packages on armel Bastien Roucariès
• 2024/08/02 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Linus Walleij
• 2024/08/02 Re: Throttling RPi4 CPU to Avoid Overheating MPJ Grégoire
• 2024/08/02 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
• 2024/08/02 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
• 2024/08/02 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
• 2024/08/01 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Linus Walleij
• 2024/08/01 Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Gandalf From The Conjurers
• 2024/08/01 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
• 2024/08/01 Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Martin
• 2024/08/01 Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Arnd Bergmann
• 2024/08/01 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Krzysztof Kozlowski
• 2024/08/01 Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2024/07/31 RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Hector Oron
• 2024/07/31 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline gene heskett
• 2024/07/31 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Andrew M.A. Cater
• 2024/07/31 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Aaro Koskinen
• 2024/07/31 Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline gene heskett
• 2024/07/31 [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
• 2024/07/28 Re: libreoffice on armhf: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints or there are not enough registers Adrian Bunk
• 2024/07/28 libreoffice on armhf: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints or there are not enough registers Rene Engelhard
• 2024/07/28 Re: Bug#1069425: uid-wrapper: FTBFS on armhf: 15: [ LINE ] --- ./tests/test_syscall.c:53: error: Failure! Drew Parsons
• 2024/07/28 Re: Bug#1069425: uid-wrapper: FTBFS on armhf: 15: [ LINE ] --- ./tests/test_syscall.c:53: error: Failure! Jeffrey Walton
• 2024/07/28 Re: Bug#1069425: uid-wrapper: FTBFS on armhf: 15: [ LINE ] --- ./tests/test_syscall.c:53: error: Failure! Drew Parsons
• 2024/07/27 Re: Throttling RPi4 CPU to Avoid Overheating Freek de Kruijf
• 2024/07/27 Throttling RPi4 CPU to Avoid Overheating MPJ Grégoire
• 2024/07/25 Re: Bug#1069425: uid-wrapper: FTBFS on armhf: 15: [ LINE ] --- ./tests/test_syscall.c:53: error: Failure! Drew Parsons
• 2024/07/22 Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Diederik de Haas
• 2024/07/22 Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/07/22 Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Diederik de Haas
• 2024/07/15 Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/07/10 PWM and SPI peripherals isidro
• 2024/07/05 Bug#1075814: plotpy: Fails to build on arm64 Jeremy Bícha
• 2024/07/05 Bug#1075815: plotpy: Failing autopkgtests Jeremy Bícha
• 2024/07/02 Re: rpi4: linux-image-6.1.0-18-arm64 kernel does not detect ds1307 rtc Uwe Kleine-König
• 2024/07/01 Bug#1074588: rust-ntp-os-clock: Fails to build on armel & armhf Jeremy Bícha
• 2024/06/27 Re: arm64, valgrind floating point instruction produces different result Bernhard Übelacker
• 2024/06/27 Re: rpi4: linux-image-6.1.0-18-arm64 kernel does not detect ds1307 rtc Uwe Kleine-König
• 2024/06/27 rpi4: linux-image-6.1.0-18-arm64 kernel does not detect ds1307 rtc Tuxo
• 2024/06/27 Bug#1074370: ffmpeg: Fails to build on armel & armhf Jeremy Bícha
• 2024/06/26 Re: arm64, valgrind floating point instruction produces different result Bernhard Übelacker
• 2024/06/26 Re: arm64, valgrind floating point instruction produces different result Jeffrey Walton
• 2024/06/26 arm64, valgrind floating point instruction produces different result Bernhard Übelacker
• 2024/06/26 Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/06/24 Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/06/24 images with GPT partition tables andrew u frank
• 2024/06/23 Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Chris Hofstaedtler
• 2024/06/21 Re: Atomic 64-bit reads from mmap-ed memory on armel... Stéphane Glondu
• 2024/06/21 Re: Atomic 64-bit reads from mmap-ed memory on armel... Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/06/21 Re: Atomic 64-bit reads from mmap-ed memory on armel... Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/06/19 Re: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100) Peter Green
• 2024/06/19 Atomic 64-bit reads from mmap-ed memory on armel... Stéphane Glondu
• 2024/06/11 Re: Bug#1069498: libx86emu: FTBFS on armhf: mem.c:581:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘inb’; did you mean ‘ins’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2024/06/11 Re: Bug#1069498: libx86emu: FTBFS on armhf: mem.c:581:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘inb’; did you mean ‘ins’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Guillem Jover
• 2024/05/27 Re: Bug#1071272: linux: building the bookworm-backports armhf kernel causes OOM on buildds Aurelien Jarno
• 2024/05/21 Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf Vagrant Cascadian
• 2024/05/20 Re: Builds not reproducible on armhf Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/05/20 Builds not reproducible on armhf Mechtilde Stehmann
• 2024/05/06 Bug#1070668: glibc: packages FTBFS caused by vector math library header on arm64 Aurelien Jarno
• 2024/04/23 Re: Status of the t64 transition Sebastian Ramacher
• 2024/04/21 Re: Status of the t64 transition Sebastian Ramacher
• 2024/04/20 Re: Re: arm eabi port, patches nikinicole50
• 2024/04/19 Re: Status of the t64 transition Étienne Mollier
• 2024/04/19 Re: Status of the t64 transition Andreas Tille
• 2024/04/19 Re: Status of the t64 transition John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2024/04/19 Re: Regression trixi ->sid: sshfs on Olimex A20-Lime2 Arnd Bergmann
• 2024/04/19 Re: Status of the t64 transition Sebastian Ramacher
• 2024/04/18 Re: Status of the t64 transition Andreas Metzler
• 2024/04/18 Status of the t64 transition Sebastian Ramacher
• 2024/04/18 Installation: root fs with btrfs fails. Arne Ploese
• 2024/04/18 Regression trixi ->sid: sshfs on Olimex A20-Lime2 Arne Ploese
• 2024/04/17 Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX? Wookey
• 2024/04/17 Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX? Lennart Sorensen
• 2024/04/17 Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX? Steffen Grunewald
• 2024/04/14 Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX? Paul Wise
• 2024/04/12 Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX? Steffen Grunewald
• 2024/04/04 Re: Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support gene heskett
• 2024/04/03 Re: Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support Hank Barta
• 2024/04/03 Re: Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support Uwe Kleine-König
• 2024/04/03 Re: Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support Diederik de Haas
• 2024/04/03 Re: Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support Thomas Lehmann
• 2024/04/03 Re: Bug#1057050 closed by Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> (reply to Patrick Franz <[email protected]>) (Bug#1057050: fixed in qt6-multimedia 6.6.1-1) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2024/04/02 Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support Thomas Lehmann
• 2024/04/02 Bug#1068288: openjdk-21: bootstrap builds required on armel and armhf Sebastian Ramacher
• 2024/04/02 Bug#1068251: glibc: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures due to GCC defaulting to 64-bit time_t Aurelien Jarno
• 2024/04/01 Re: Bug#1068078: FTBFS on armel: shiboken2:smart::smart_pointer Newly detected Real test failure! Dmitry Shachnev
• 2024/03/30 Re: What's wrong with this entry in a cron job? Freek de Kruijf
• 2024/03/30 Re: What's wrong with this entry in a cron job? Leigh Brown
• 2024/03/30 What's wrong with this entry in a cron job? Freek de Kruijf
• 2024/03/28 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/28 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Wookey
• 2024/03/27 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/27 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Wookey
• 2024/03/27 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Wookey
• 2024/03/26 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/26 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Wookey
• 2024/03/26 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/26 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Jeffrey Walton
• 2024/03/26 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/26 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Jeffrey Walton
• 2024/03/26 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/26 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/23 Bug#1067559: nmu: roc-toolkit_0.3.0+dfsg-7 Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/21 Bug#1067430: nmu: graphviz_2.42.2-9 Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/21 Re: Bug#1067421: nmu: gstreamer1.0_1.24.0-1 Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/21 Bug#1067421: nmu: gstreamer1.0_1.24.0-1 Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/21 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Alex
• 2024/03/20 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Alex
• 2024/03/20 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Hank Barta
• 2024/03/20 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Alex
• 2024/03/20 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Alex
• 2024/03/20 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Alex
• 2024/03/20 Bug#1067213: git: please consider temporarily disabling subversion/libsvn-perl build-dependencies on armhf and armel Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/03/19 Re: Bug#1062847: protobuf: Use dh-sequence-elpa in Build-Depends-Indep Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/18 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/03/17 Re: Bug#1067043: libruby: needs updating for libruby3.1t64 Chris Hofstaedtler
• 2024/03/17 Bug#1067043: libruby: needs updating for libruby3.1t64 Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/16 Bug#1067026: graphviz: please build without librsvg except on rust platforms Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/16 Bug#1066982: curl: please consider temporarily disabling LDAP and build-time tests on 32-bit non-x86 Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/15 Re: strange behavior with i2c on raspberry pi 4 basti
• 2024/03/15 Re: strange behavior with i2c on raspberry pi 4 basti
• 2024/03/14 Re: strange behavior with i2c on raspberry pi 4 Alex
• 2024/03/14 strange behavior with i2c on raspberry pi 4 basti
• 2024/03/14 Bug#1066847: openssh: please consider disabling ssh-askpass-gnome on 32-bit during the time_t transition Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/14 Bug#1066844: at-spi2-core: needs re-bootstrapping on armel, armhf for 64-bit time_t transition Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/14 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Helge Deller
• 2024/03/13 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/13 Bug#1066832: fsverity-utils: hard Build-Depends on unportable package pandoc Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/13 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Alex
• 2024/03/13 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Alex
• 2024/03/13 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/03/13 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Alex
• 2024/03/12 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Andrew M.A. Cater
• 2024/03/12 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t Fabian Grünbichler
• 2024/03/12 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t Steve Langasek
• 2024/03/12 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/03/12 Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t Simon McVittie
• 2024/03/12 Re: Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Alex
• 2024/03/12 Governor problem with generic 6.1 arm64 kernel on Raspberry Alex
• 2024/03/11 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/11 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Jérémy Lal
• 2024/03/11 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/11 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Jérémy Lal
• 2024/03/11 python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/10 Re: Bug#1065756: pngnq: FTBFS on arm{el, hf}: rwpng.c:242:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strncmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 肖盛文
• 2024/03/10 Re: Bug#1065756: pngnq: FTBFS on arm{el, hf}: rwpng.c:242:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strncmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Sebastian Ramacher
• 2024/03/09 Re: Bug#1065756: pngnq: FTBFS on arm{el, hf}: rwpng.c:242:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strncmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 肖盛文
• 2024/03/09 Re: Bug#1065756: pngnq: FTBFS on arm{el, hf}: rwpng.c:242:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strncmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 肖盛文
• 2024/03/08 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Paul Gevers
• 2024/03/05 Re: Raspberry PI 5 Lennart Sorensen
• 2024/03/05 Raspberry PI 5 John Danielsson
• 2024/03/04 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Adrian Bunk
• 2024/03/04 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Gerardo Ballabio
• 2024/03/03 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Frank Weißer
• 2024/03/03 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Gianluca Renzi
• 2024/03/03 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin
• 2024/03/03 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Ástor Ayllón Lázaro
• 2024/03/03 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Cyril Brulebois
• 2024/03/03 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Christoph Biedl
• 2024/02/14 Re: Really enable -fstack-clash-protection on armhf/armel? Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/01/24 Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/01/23 Bug#1061370: gcc-14 ftbfs on armel Matthias Klose
• 2024/01/19 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Bastian Blank
• 2024/01/19 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Arnd Bergmann
• 2024/01/17 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Ben Hutchings
• 2024/01/17 Re: Bug#1061063: armhf: h5py's tests expose unaligned memory accesses during the build Aurelien Jarno
• 2024/01/15 Bug#1060849: mesa: FTBFS on armel: static assertion failed: "vn_ring_shared requires lock-free 32-bit atomic_uint" Simon McVittie
• 2024/01/13 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Aurelien Jarno
• 2024/01/13 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank
• 2024/01/13 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Dimitri John Ledkov
• 2024/01/12 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Hank Barta
• 2024/01/12 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Alan Corey
• 2024/01/12 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank
• 2024/01/12 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures gene heskett
• 2024/01/12 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Alan Corey
• 2024/01/12 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys
• 2024/01/12 Re: Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie [armhf rebuild] Lucas Nussbaum
• 2024/01/12 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures rhys
• 2024/01/12 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures YunQiang Su
• 2024/01/12 Re: Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100) Emanuele Rocca
• 2024/01/12 Error: bad immediate value for offset (4100) Mathieu Malaterre
• 2024/01/11 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Aurelien Jarno
• 2024/01/11 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Jeffrey Walton
• 2024/01/11 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Adrian Bunk
• 2024/01/11 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank
• 2024/01/11 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank
• 2024/01/11 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2024/01/11 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures Dimitri John Ledkov
• 2024/01/11 Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2024/01/11 Ability to further support 32bit architectures Bastian Blank
• 2024/01/10 Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Dimitri John Ledkov
• 2024/01/10 Re: Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Martin
• 2024/01/10 Future for armel? (was: Re: What to do with d-i on armel?) Bastian Blank
• 2024/01/09 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Arnd Bergmann
• 2024/01/09 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Peter Green
• 2024/01/09 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? gene heskett
• 2024/01/09 Re: What to do with d-i on armel? Martin

• Earlier messages
• Later messages