* Rod Whitby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-14 09:50]: > >> As for subsequent partitions, I see no reason to put > >> a SerComm header on them. > > That's what I thought. Perhaps you can convince Martin. ;-) > I thought that's what we'd all agreed on :-(
I don't think that was something we ever discussed. The patch I did for slugimage was minimal, which meant that there was a sercomm header, as on all other partitions... > > apex> copy fis://kernel $bootaddr > > apex> copy fis://ramdisk $ramdiskaddr > > Now that's clear. > Indeed. Okay, I'll try to update the patch for slugimage tomorrow or so. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
