* Samuele Bianchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-25 09:12]: > I think that could be very interesting a comparison with thecus 2100 ( or > similar as allnet 6500 )
I don't have any benchmarks, but here are some differences I can think of: - The N2100 uses a CPU that has reached its end of life (EOL) Marvell is actively working on good support for the CPU used in the QNAP - N2100 has a basic recovery mechanism whereas the QNAP doesn't at the moment (although this will hopefully change) - The N2100 has expandable RAM (up to 512 MB) whereas the QNAP doesn't - The N2100 has a mini-PCI slot which the QNAP doesn't have - The QNAP has much better cooling - The case of the QNAP is much more stable than that of the N2100. IIRC the fan on the QNAP is also more quiet. (And the TS-109 doesn't have a fan at all.) -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
