On 14 December 2011 21:30, Stuart Winter <[email protected]> wrote: > Slackware, like Debian is a general purpose OS aiming to meet most users' > needs on the common denominator hardware -- which on ARM is armv4.
Some instructions were added in v5E: count-leading-zeroes, 16-bit multipliers, saturating arithmetic, a preload instruction, double word loads and stores and a faster instruction to switch between ARM and Thumb modes in function returns. See Column 3 of http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.qrc0001l/QRC0001_UAL.pdf where is says "5E". It's unlikely that a compiler would be able to make much use of any of these: CLZ is used in assembly-language division routines, saturating arithmetic is unusable when compiling, faster switching between ARM and Thumb is useless. The compiler may be able to make use of the preloads to reduce the memory bottleneck and of the double word load/stores. > Will there be much of a performance difference for regular server-type > workloads (e.g. file serving etc) as distinct from playing media and > desktop usage with web browsers etc? Probably not, since that kind of application will be mainly memory-, network- and disk-bound. > Also, will an OS compiled for armv5 perform better on armv7 hardware? Probably the same size gain as you get on v5 hardware. > My understanding is that only certain workloads -- e.g. playing video -- would > benefit from compiling for armv5. These will benefit more from the SIMD instructions, for which you can recompile the specific libraries for your actual target processor. A few applications and libraries will benefit from mandating a floating point processor such as VFP - here the speedups are a factor of three to four, and switching the hardfloat ABI gives another 30% or so I gather. However, that would also eliminate any board with no FPU. > Thanks in advance for any ideas -- just rough instinctive feelings are all > I'm after (unless somone does have any actual figures of running Debian > armel userland compiled for armv4 vs armel compiled for armv5). Of course, that is the real answer... you could compare a Debian and a Ubuntu userland, which are build from almost identical sourves using the same mechanisms and compiler. I'd be very interested to know your measured results. My feeling is that the speed gain would be in the 5-10% range at best. For a general-purpose operating system you need to evaluate whether that's worth the effort and exclusion of low-end machines. M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cal4-wqpbw0cyy+615bp_qmfvryz1mryn9pi4sdgueupkaxv...@mail.gmail.com
