On Thursday 09 November 2017 12:40:59 Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2017-11-07, Adrian Bunk <b...@debian.org> wrote: > > This whole "so many packages are broken on armel" narrative > > is actually mostly FUD, and you are suggesting mitigations > > for a nonexisting problem. > > Have we gotten full c++11 support on armel yet ? > > (future, atomic, ...) > > /Sune
Chuckle, c++11 on the armel? Is that not just a bit like asking it to clean the Aegean Stables? Give the poor thing a chance to catch its breath. ;-) Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>