On 2019-04-11 23:15:45 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 04:51:50PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:24 AM peter green <plugw...@p10link.net> wrote: > > > > > > I got a report from a user about "openssl sha1 <filename>" not working > > > for large files on raspbian stretch. > > > > > > I investigated the problem and found that when I tried to use "openssl > > > sha1 <filename>" for a large (>2GB) file on Debian armhf stretch or > > > raspbian stretch I get an error "Value too large for defined data type" > > > > > > > > > What puzzles me is that it worked on raspbian buster, and also worked on > > > debian stretch i386. According to the user who reported it to me it > > > worked on Raspbian jessie. Anyone have any clues? I'm not finding > > > anything obvious in the build logs or from a quick look at the source (it > > > seems a couple of source files are built with large file support and the > > > rest are not, but which files doesn't seem to have changed between > > > stretch and buster). > > > > > > > Likely coming from the shell and not OpenSSL; see > > https://serverfault.com/q/735636/145545. > > > > Maybe coreutils changed something recently. > > Note that is just the string for strerror(EOVERFLOW). It could be > that we use something like fstat() and get that errno.
strace should reveal where it is coming from. > Kurt Sebastian
