On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:26:25PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > piece of software. I'd regard any gain for more detail as a waste of > > time. As I said, this is some first experiment with uncertain outcome. > > well DFSG free != DFSG free ;-) information (even coarse and > over-generalized) on licensing might be of interest for people > overviewing task pages in search for a license-compatible library
OK. I'd be very happily accept patches. :-) I did not wanted to say that it is totally uninteresting. I just intended to say, that the effort to gain more than DFSG free or not is too high and way to error prone that I consider spending my time into it. I could be convinced by patches for sure. > > discussion. My code is not yet functional (you might have read my > > requests for help for the python-debian module - I probably will do some > > I think I have seen it but missed it :-/ would it be too much to ask a > reference to the request? http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/04/msg00360.html and later I also bounced the very same mail to debian-qa http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2012/04/msg00035.html (both after having contacted the package author in PM). I wonder if I should try bouncing this mail to debian-devel. Any help would be really welcome. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
