Hello Andreas,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have no idea how it can happen that an entry is duplicated - but that > > > should be avoided. > > > > > > That's strange, my copy of UDD does not show these differences. Can you > > attach me control/control-sec/taskdesc/taskdesc-sec files from your copy > of > > UDD, it help me to understand where the problem is. > > I attached a tarball. > > From the files of the tarball : diff control control-sec 398a399 > lv2fil [!hurd-i386], 429a431 > timemachine, diff taskdesc.template taskdesc-sec.template 384a385 > lv2fil [!hurd-i386] >From the above it seems that the packages "timemachine" and "lv2fil" might be duplicated in the your local UDD copy in blends_dependencies_alternatives(just a suspicion). Can you tell me what results you get with these: * select blend, task, package, distribution, component, dependency, provides from blends_dependencies where package='timemachine' and blend='openstudio'; * select blend, task, package, distribution, component, dependency, provides from blends_dependencies where package='lv2fil' and blend='openstudio'; and * select blend, task, alternatives, distribution, component, dependency, contains_provides from blends_dependencies_alternatives where alternatives like '%timemachine%' and blend='openstudio'; * select blend, task, alternatives, distribution, component, dependency, contains_provides from blends_dependencies_alternatives where alternatives like '%lv2fil%' and blend='openstudio'; Kind regards Emmanouil
