Hi, On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Ole, > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:56:14AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am curious whether there is a log file available for the processing of > > the tasks files (f.e. debian-science) to create the web pages? > > The log files can be accessed here: > > http://blends.debian.org/_logs/http://blends.debian.org/_logs/
Can this page be accessed by everyone ? I get a 404 Not Found Error. > > Specifically, I am looking at the "astronomy" pages: > > > > http://blends.debian.org/science/tasks/astronomy > > > > which have some glitches that I do not understand: > > > > * Fitscut has "??? missing short description for package fitscut :-(" as > > its description -- however, the debian/control file actually *has* a > > short and a long description > > Strange was this package recently (= in the last 48 hours) accepted? > I'd need to check UDD about this. In principle the following should > be seen: > > $ apt-cache show fitscut | grep -A 3 ^Description-en > Description-en: Extract cutouts from FITS image format files > fitscut is designed to extract cutouts from FITS image format files. > FITS, PNG, and JPEG output types are supported. When multiple input > files are specified and the output type is PNG or JPEG the resulting > ... The tasks page shows the correct short description for Fitscut now. But for "Swarp", "Cpl-plugin-amber" and "Cpl-plugin-muse", the short description as well as the long description are missing. > > * For some packages, the description seems to come from the git > > repository, while for others it is taken from the packages in > > unstable. F.e. cpl-plugin-muse has the description from unstable > > (which would have a fixed version in git) > > For *existing* packages the description is taken from unstable. For so > called "prospective" packages the description is taken from VCS. In > UDD we keep the VCS metadata only for not yet existing packages. I understand that the description of packages that already exist in the Debian Package Pool comes from Umegaya and the description for packages that do not *exist* comes from VCS. Is this the expected behavior? Or because of the bug in Umegaya[2], the description is outdated and we should add an Upsert() functionality like we plan to do for references? > > * I recently added lots of upstream/metadata to my packages; some of > > them show up now, but others don't. f.e. cpl-plugin-muse shows the > > citation (from git), while sextractor does not (also has one in git). > > This issue is most probably caused by a broken Umegaya (see [2]). The > current task of the Blends GSoC student is to prefer VCS metadata over > Umegaya (which also queries VCS but is actually broken[2]). So this > will hopefully be solved in the next couple of days. Hopefully the separate script for generating the bibtex file, which prefers VCS metadata over Umegaya, will solve this issue. > > * Some packages don't mention the uploader(s), f.e. Python-scientific has > > Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel (from the PTS), but the astronomy page shows > > "Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers ()" > > Hmmm, perhaps checking this might be the next task for the GSoC student > to solve? Need to check this as well. I am working on this. I will let you know about it soon. > [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2015/02/msg00038.html -- Regards, Akshita Jha
