Hi,
In blendstasktools.py, class TaskDependencies, the function
GetTaskDependencies() reads information from tasks file. Since we are using
UDD, this function needs major changing. I have written the queries to
fetch all the information about dependant packages (which are in Debian and
also prospective packages).
Query 1:
query = "SELECT DISTINCT b.package, p.description, p.homepage,
p.maintainer_name, p.maintainer_email \
FROM blends_dependencies b JOIN packages p ON
p.package=b.package \
WHERE b.blend='%s' AND b.task='%s'" % (self.blendname,
self.task)
The above query gets information about 'official' packages.
Query 2:
query = "SELECT DISTINCT bp.package, bp.maintainer, bp.homepage,
bp.description, bp.long_description, \
bp.vcs_type, bp.vcs_url, bp.vcs_browser, bp.section,
bp.license, bp.wnpp, bp.wnpp_type, bp.wnpp_desc \
FROM blends_prospectivepackages bp JOIN blends_dependencies
b ON b.blend=bp.blend \
WHERE bp.blend='%s' and b.task='%s'" % (self.blendname,
self.task)
The above query gets all the information about blends_prospective packages.
How do I store the information that I get ?
Currently, what I am doing is using the same variables that are in
blendstasktools.py and storing the information accordingly.
eg:
Query 3:
query = "SELECT title FROM blends_tasks WHERE task='%s' AND blend='%s'" %
(self.task, self.blendname)
_execute_udd_query(query)
if curs.rowcount > 0:
self.metapkg.PrintedName = curs.fetchone()[0]
Is this how I should continue ?
Also, I an unable to push my changes to repo. This is my git config file:
[core]
repositoryformatversion = 0
filemode = true
bare = false
logallrefupdates = true
[remote "origin"]
url = ssh://git.debian.org/git/blends/website.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
[branch "master"]
remote = origin
merge = refs/heads/master
[user]
email = [email protected]
name = Akshita Jha
[push]
default = simple
You had suggested to change the url from git://..... to ssh://..... I
changed it, but I am still not able to push to repo using git push. It
gives me a the following error:
ssh: connect to host git.debian.org port 22: Connection timed out
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
What can be the issue here ?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my internet connection is also weak ... since we are sitting on a boat
> (sse images).
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:51:33PM +0530, Akshita Jha wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had a really erratic internet connection last week. However, it seems
> to
> > be stable now and this is an update on what I have done so far and what I
> > plan to complete by the end of this week.
> >
> > In blendstasktools.py module I have completed:
> >
> > - Rewriting and testing the methods InitMetapackages() and
> > GetAllDependencies() in class Tasks
> > - Rewriting and testing class Dependant Package
> > - Rewriting the method and testing SetMetapackageInfo() in class
> > TaskDependencies
> > - Rewriting the method GetTaskDependencies() in class
> TaskDependencies.
> >
> > This week, I plan to:
> >
> > - Test the method GetTaskDependencies()
> > - Complete rewriting blendstasktools.py module to use only UDD
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Akshita,
> > >
> > > Any commit to the master branch of the remote repository will be
> > > automatically pulled by a cron job on blends.debian.{org,net} so we
> need
> > > to make sure that we will not break the production system. Since I
> > > would prefer to check and test your current work we have two options:
> > > You create a new branch (gsoc, udd, whateveryouwant) or you choose a
> > > temporary new name. WHen I started rewriting bugs.py I ave choosen
> > > bugs_udd.py. The advantage of the later method is that you can test
> > > both in parallel on the production systems if you also use a different
> > > output directory as long as we are in development (.../tasks_udd or so)
> > >
> > > If you consider the later as an advantage yourself than lets do it this
> > > way. Otherwise you might like to convince me about a different branch
> > > if you have some good reasons. :-)
> > >
> >
> > I think your suggestion to use blendstasktools_udd.py and tasks_udd.py is
> > good. I will commit my code to the repository soon. After that you can
> test
> > the code and suggest changes.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Akshita
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
--
Akshita Jha
