Hi, On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Akshita, > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 07:37:52PM +0530, Akshita Jha wrote: > > > > Yes, the prepared query - query_vcs does reflect this. I had rewritten the > > query to fetch information from blends_prospective packages. > > What exactly did you intended with the rewrite? >
I was just testing some things (for my own curiosity) and I forgot to revert to the original for the final commit. My bad. > > I have changed > > it to use the existing query_vcs. The version is now present for > > prospective packages. > > Hmmm, I can not see the citations for the example package express. > I have not added the citations information yet. I'll add it as soon as possible. I have just added 'version' for prospective packages now. > Moreover I realised that the old implementation of "Versions and Archs" > is not the way I described before. I think there ordering is > > ORDER BY version, release > > (See for instance bwa package in bio) > > I admit I'm not very proud upon this since it looks a bit mixed but for > the sake of comparison it makes sense if you may be also simply use the > original query (or at least the ordering. Ok. So, initially I was using the already prepared queries - qurey_pkgs, query_new and now query_vcs as it is (without changing anything). Still there was a difference in Version and Archs of the tasks files that were generated from tasks_udd.py and tasks.py files. I'll recheck if I've missed something and let you know/ -- Regards, Akshita Jha
