Hi, On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:19:25AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > In my reading this page does not describe a requirement, but a > status. And currently every released Pure Blend *has* metapackages, > right?
Yes, only blends which can be installed in Debian stable are "released", in line with the way that we describe everything else in Debian. > "The released Pure Blends have metapackages in the > <a href="https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/>stable</a> release of > Debian. Some Pure Blends also provide installation media or form the > basis of a derivative distribution. See the individual Blends pages for > more information." I do like this. > A naming question: are there any "non-pure" blends yet? I feel the > current convention a bit confusing: The Terminology in the Wiki means: > > | "Blend" is a Debian-based distribution that is, or wants to become, a > | Pure Blend ... > > (not mentioning another meaning) > The new web pages has: > > | Debian Pure Blends are also just called Blends when used clearly in > | the Debian internal context which makes "Pure" and "Debian" obvious, > | like on this page. I hate this paragraph and it is planned to be replaced. > I would propose to either consequently stick to "[Debian] Pure Blends", > or to remove the non-pure definition from the Wiki and just to make the > first paragraph of www.d.o/blends as "Debian Pure Blends (or Blends, for > short) are a solution for special groups ...". I think there are blends that are not Pure Blends, and we should list these seperately on the Pure Blends page. Thanks, Iain. --
