Your message dated Sun, 6 Aug 2000 21:37:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2000 16:30:45 +0000
Received: (qmail 19612 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2000 16:30:44 -0000
Received: from chicago.bdsinc.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2000 16:30:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 19204 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2000 16:30:35 -0000
Received: from cooler.bdschi.com (HELO tallan.com) (192.9.202.13)
by chilin.bdschi.com with SMTP; 17 Mar 2000 16:30:34 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:32:37 -0600
From: "Jens B. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Tallan, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: configuration of ne module doesn't user params supplied
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
package: installation
version: 2.2.8-2000-03-09
I was doing a fresh install from the compact 1.44 disk set. When I went
to configure the ISA ne ethernet card I supplied 'io=0x300 irq=10' as
the params since this device must have at least io specified. The
modules failed to load. I exited to a shell and looked at dmesg and
noticed that the ne module complained:
ne.c: No PCI cards found. Use "io=0xNNN" values(s) for ISA cards.
So, I just manually ran:
insmod ne io=0x300 irq=10
and the module inserted just fine. I conclude from this that the module
configuration isn't passing the parameters I supplied in the
installation interface.
--
Jens B. Jorgensen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 60620-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2000 19:37:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 06 14:37:33 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kuolema.infodrom.north.de [195.27.69.163] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 13LWEn-0006Ku-00; Sun, 06 Aug 2000 14:37:33 -0500
Received: from finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE (finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
[195.27.69.162])
by kuolema.infodrom.north.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C056D146E7D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 6 Aug 2000 21:33:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: at Infodrom Oldenburg (/\##/\ Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2)
by finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
via smail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 6 Aug 2000 21:37:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 21:37:21 +0200
From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: done
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This bug is fixed, dunno in which version but it is in the current
version.
Regards,
Joey
--
Unix is user friendly ... It's just picky about its friends.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
