Ben Collins wrote: > > Maybe that's all the hardware detection we should bother with. Is there > > really any point in worrying about making life easier for owners of ISA > > hardware these days? > > IMO, we shouldn't. Trying to autodetect ISA is probably more harm than > good anyway. On the other hand, if the library we pick has ISA detection for free, and it doesn't add much code bloat, and it can optionally be done, we can offer it as an option. So I think it's a nice extra, but not required in whatever library we pick, and it _is_ required the library can skip all invasive detection. We should dig up that list someone posted of various hardware detection libraries and look at the rest of them too. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Two new goals? Torsten Landschoff
- Re: Two new goals? Bernhard R. Link
- Re: Two new goals? Torsten Landschoff
- Re: Two new goals? Marcin Owsiany
- Re: Two new goals? Joey Hess
- Re: Two new goals? Torsten Landschoff
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Ben Collins
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Ben Collins
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Glenn McGrath
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Ben Collins
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Michael S. Fischer
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Glenn McGrath
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Michael S. Fischer
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Ben Collins
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess