On Wed Oct 25, 2000 at 09:26:00PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > > dists/ stable/ main/
> > > binary-i386/
> > > various .debs
> > > disks-i386/
> > > various .udebs
> > > some basic boot-floppies
> > > release notes
> > > source/
> > > source to all the .debs and .udebs
> >
> > I don't like this scheme because it's assuming either/or with debian-installer vs
> > boot-floppies. Forcing this either/or decision is going to make releasing woody a
>lot
> > harder.
>
> Do you think we should try to get some directory like
> dists/unstable/main/debian-installer? I'm all for it since it's a
> clearer directory name anyway.
I'd go for dists/unstable/debian-installer myself. This is really not a part
of main. And since we are requiring completely separate packages (.udebs),
having a separate archive section makes sense really. The only downside (which
favors dists/unstable/main/debian-installer), is that then we would duplicate
src packages for things also in main...
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
