"John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> well. in the short term, it is a whole lot easier to just make the
> extra targets in the makefiles w/o the % and if the dependency has a %
> in it
> resc1440%.bin: $(root_for_rescue) linux% rescue.sh $(arch_rescue_deps)
Yes... we should do that. Sorry if I broke it. If you didn't get to
this, I'll try to fix it tomorrow.
> making a whole new stanza (which is what i have done locally, just so i
> can get something built - it seems that not all the kernels exist in
> testing yet ?)
Sure, that's no problem.
> how much work, really, do we want to put into woody b-f?
Just enough!
--
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
