Re: should ext2 be formated to support 2.0 kernels?

[Adam Di Carlo]

I've changed the ext2 / kernel versioning stuff.

Question is not a double negative anymore.

Default on non-arm is 2.2 support;
Default on arm is 2.0 support

I am considering changing this so that it doesn't even prompt, but
just goes with the defaults, unless 'verbose' is on.

Thoughts?

-- 
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]