On Thursday 10 July 2008, Frans Pop wrote: > I've mailed the issue to lkml: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/10/9. > > My guess is that the verdict will be that upx will just have to be > taught about the changed kernel format and to not mangle the > "compressed payload".
My guess was correct, but with helpful replies. I've now filed BRs against upx both upstream and in Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/490149 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2014835&group_id=2331&atid=102331
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.