Hi, On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 18:34 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 17:54 +0100, Sven Neumann a écrit : > > I can get your patches into gtk+ SVN if you do the patch review. Just > > point me to bug reports at bugzilla.gnome.org that have patches for > > GTK-DirectFB attached that you want to see committed and I will take > > care of committing them into GTK+ trunk. I can also merge them to the > > stable branch if they apply without too much hassle. > > You can start with the existing ones for 2.12 :) > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447118 (only the first patch). > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543710
I have added comments to these two. Please note that I can only commit changes to trunk (and then merge them to the gtk-2-14 branch). There's no point in applying changes to the gtk-2-12 branch as that branch is obsolete. Currently it appears that neither gtk-2-14 nor gtk+ trunk compile if the DirectFB backend is selected. We need to address this before anything else. So is there a patch that deals with the internal API changes so that the tree can at least be compiled again? That would be the first patch that gets committed. > There are also some patches coming from Ubuntu, but I don’t know if > there are corresponding reports in bugzilla: > http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/gtk+2.0/2.14.7-1/071_correct_directfb_declarations.patch > http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/gtk+2.0/2.14.7-1/072_workaround_directfb_build.patch The GTK+ development process requires bug reports to be opened in the GNOME bug tracker before a change can be made in the gtk+ tree. Please do that if you want those changes to be applied upstream. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org