On Wed,18.Mar.09, 23:04:25, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mer, 2009-03-18 at 18:59 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > Yves-Alexis Perez <cor...@debian.org> writes: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > Good point, but the change need to be made in tasksel, so it's not > > > irrelevant to discuss that in tasksel lists. But maybe it'd be even > > > better to discuss that on a bug reported against tasksel? What do you > > > think Andrei? A bug seemed a bit annoying for this, especially since I wasn't sure about the package.
> > I belive the right place to discuss it is in xfce mailing list and after > > a conclusion has been made, report a bug against tasksel (with a patch > > if possible) for us to update it. > > > > Obviously if we think something is wrong we'll ask and discuss it in the > > bug report but a lot of noise could be avoided if doing this way. And it > > will also speedup things for you all. > > Ok, if it's fine with you :) > > Andrei, could you please post a summary to pkg-xfce mailing list, with > what you think would be nice to have or nice to not have on the xfce > task? I'll provide my input (maybe in beginning of april because I'm > going to not be around until end of march) and then we'll provide > tasksel a patch with the all the data, when 4.6 have ended in unstable > etc. Ok, will repost in pkg-xfce list after I've tested ristretto ;) Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature