On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:53:59PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 14 April 2009, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > * NetworkManager is used on most distros (and Debian as well) for > > desktop installations. NetworkManager always use wpasupplicant for > > interaction with wireless networks so now both wpasupplicant and the > > drivers have been quite tested. > > > > Getting rid of our custom code dealing with the wireless sounds to > > favor more commonly used software sounds like a desirable goal to me. > > > > What do other thinks? > > As long as networkmanager does not become a requirement. Installing a > system using wireless should result in working networking both with and > without networkmanager installed in the target system.
Sure, I was only thinking about netcfg internals. Configuring /e/n/i should be done as it currently is, only installing wpasupplicant by default if a WPA network was used for the installation. (The later is currently not covered by Glenn's work IIRC.) Cheers, -- Jérémy Bobbio .''`. lu...@debian.org : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature