On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:30:11PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 23 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > > Hmmm. If I compare the MANIFEST.udebs from testing and my build the only > > thing that jumps out is: > > - libfribidi0-udeb 0.10.9-1+b1 amd64 > > + libfribidi0-udeb 0.19.2-1 amd64 > > Confirmed and bug filed (#571044).
It's possible (and arguably sane, on the basis of defence in depth at least) to work around this in newt. See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570581 -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100224112832.ga5...@master.debian.org
