On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 09:00:29PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > You rarely ought to need to touch it and in this case it being available > > by preseeding or low priority looks to be the sanest way to go. > > Agreed. But I see no reason why this should be available through preseeding > only. This type of question is exactly why we have expert mode. > > > In modern machine the default ought to be the most logical option and > > ought to work fine (and even provide some performance benefit in some > > cases) so this shouldn't be so easy to mess with it IMO. > > So it should not be asked at default priority and have a very clear > description. > > IMO having at as a regular question at default prio with a good description > also allows to document the issue better (or at least, makes the > "documentation" more accessible).
I agree that it would make sense to ask this at (probably) medium priority, although I'm not sure when I'll have time to make this change. Perhaps somebody could file a reminder bug? -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100427100455.ga6...@master.debian.org
