On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 09:29:40PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > >> I also reported a bug suggesting to lower the priority at which this > >> template is displayed.
> > It's a main menu item. Doesn't the priority of udeb menu item > > templates affect either a) whether the udeb is *run* by default, or > > b) nothing (I can't remember which)? > I suspect Christian was refering to the debconf question presented by > the package. It is using debconf priority high to ask if the detected > drive should be used to load drivers. I suspect its priority should > be lowered to medium as Christian suggests. > The menu item do not have a debconf priority, and thus its menu > handling is not affected by any debconf priority. :) > There is also the template priority which affect what translators work > on, and there I suspect Christians changes were correct. This new > udeb is not used in the common case, and its translations should thus > not be very high priority. Oh, sorry for misunderstanding. Yes, if this is about the priority of the question about whether to *use* the driver disk that's been found, I think medium (with a default answer of 'yes') seems reasonable. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100529200956.ga5...@dario.dodds.net
