On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 15:23 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:00:38AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > >I don't think libuuid-perl really needs perl and I have filed #588427 to > >that effect. > > Cool.
It's tagged as pending already in the perl team's VCS, very fast turnaround. > >I was wondering why linux-headers were on the CD in the first place and > >find that tools/generate_di+k_list says: > > /* Note that we do not have to include every optimised kernel flavor > > for > > * i386, but this does control what kernels are available on the > > netinst CD. > > * Kernel headers are included as third party modules are commonly > > * used on this architecture. > > */ > >so it's only for amd64 and i386 but it is on all ISO images. Could we > >consider making this only for certain image types? It would save 10M. > > Yes we could, but I don't see it as such an issue elsewhere. It's the > m-a netinst CD I'm really trying to cut down as a priority. By "only for certain image types" I guess I really meant "not for the m-a netinst CD" ;-) Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: Karma to Burn - Five When you dig another out of trouble, you've got a place to bury your own. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
