Your message dated Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:31:49 -0500
with message-id <20110208143149.ga2...@campus.mcgill.ca>
and subject line Re: Bug#289831: Bug #289831 wrong grub config with additional
linux installed/general feedback
has caused the Debian Bug report #289831,
regarding wrong grub config with additional linux installed/general feedback
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
289831: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=289831
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 11/01/2005 main debian page
uname -a: Linux locutus 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 11/01/2005
Method: Boot by cd network installer image, direct connection to the
internnet, no proxy
Machine: <Beschreibung des Rechners (z.B. IBM Thinkpad R32)>
Processor:
Memory:
Root Device: ide: hda
Root Size/partition table:
/dev/hda1 * 1 1275 10241406 c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/hda2 1276 1928 5245222+ 1c Hidden W95 FAT32
(LBA)
/dev/hda3 1929 14593 101731612+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5 4068 14593 84550063+ 83 Linux
/dev/hda6 * 1929 2972 8385867 83 Linux
~ the installation was made on the hda6 system
/dev/hda7 2973 3131 1277136 82 Linux Swap
/dev/hda8 3132 4067 7518388+ 83 Linux
~ another linux backup system
Output of lspci and lspci -n:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8377 [KT400/KT600
AGP] Host Bridge
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 PCI Bridge
0000:00:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1371 [AudioPCI-97]
(rev 08)
0000:00:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82541GI/PI Gigabit
Ethernet Controller
0000:00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB
1.1 Controller (rev 80)
0000:00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB
1.1 Controller (rev 80)
0000:00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB
1.1 Controller (rev 80)
0000:00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 82)
0000:00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge
0000:00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
0000:00:12.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102
[Rhine-II] (rev 74)
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon
RV250 If [Radeon 9000] (rev 01)
0000:01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV250
[Radeon 9000] (Secondary) (rev 01)
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Initial boot worked: [ x]
Configure network HW: [ no dhcp availiable]
Config network: [ x]
Detect CD: [ x]
Load installer modules: [ x]
Detect hard drives: [ x]
Partition hard drives: [ ]
Create file systems: [ x]
Mount partitions: [ x]
Install base system: [ x]
Install boot loader: [ x]
Reboot: [ x]
Comments/Problems:
everything worked fine beside the grub configuration was slightly wrong.
The second linux on the hda8 was recogniced and two entries in the
menu.conf generated, but the kernel root= parameter has been set wrong
(set like the installation partition)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB45bu7QhrwFQeHVsRArPjAJ9Tb8tOJLh3vDhJ3AsC43xxJq3qnwCcCooY
6H4nNyea1paQ2sjUfQWPIxE=
=Atjf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Birk Bremer wrote [2009-06-08]:
> I'm sorry to inform you that I don't have the means the reproduce
> this bug anymore. -
> frankly I did not even remember anymore that I reported it. ;-)
>
> I just looked the report up - as far as I recollect the problem was,
> that the grub entrance during the second installation was not
> correctly written.
>
> As I told before - I can't verify if such a thing still happens
> (currently I don't even have a Linux System availiable)
Considering this statement and the changes in d-i and os-prober since
the original report (2005), I think it is safe to close this bug.
Thanks for reporting.
--- End Message ---