Joey Hess wrote: >Philipp Kern wrote: >> This requires a bunch of changes and I'm not aware of all places that need to >> be fixed to refer to a new daily build location. But maybe someone else >> knows >> and can do it. >> >> If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can install it >> there, too. Otherwise most is explained in [1]. > >Thanks, Phil. > >The places I know of are in debian-cd and debian-www, as well as a few >in d-i of course. Plus literally half a million other places that link >to ~joeyh/d-i/images. I will have to put up a redirect for a long while..
Update to debian-cd is in svn now. >I do wonder if, now that there is buildd autosigning, it would make more >sense to do a source-only upload of debian-installer daily and let it >autobuild like any package. This would avoid the SPOF of it being on a >single buildd, and let us use the whole buildd infractrucure for logs, >etc. Only likely problem I can see is it might be too big a hit on the >mirrors. \o/ Please let's do this. I've been pushing for d-i to go through the archive properly for years. We could also then just let the normal testing scripts handle migration, amongst many other positive things. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Is there anybody out there? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qjhim-0007xr...@jack.mossbank.org.uk
