On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:32:35PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 16.12.2011 18:38, Joey Hess wrote: > > Christian PERRIER wrote: > >> I'm inclined to follow this advice and would indeed propose that the > >> "atomic" partman-auto recipe is kept, however without a separate /usr > >> partition (discussions on -devel and the current practice convinced me > >> that a separate /usr is seomthing that probably belongs to the former > >> century..:-)
> > I don't think that d-i should be on the leading edge of this discussion. > > Once Debian has made up its mind, d-i can be updated to follow the > > consensus. > To me it looks like there is broad consensus that a separate /usr > partition should be considered deprecated and this option removed from > the installer. There isn't. There's just a broad consensus among those who are talking about changing things. Some of us think this is completely bogus and are really sick of the same already-rebutted arguments being repeated over and over on the list as if that makes them true. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature