On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 10:15:42AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: >On 02/07/2013 09:59 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >>That doesn't >>mean we should be keeping syslinux 5 in sid in the meanwhile, especially >>since that's preventing us from releasing d-i wheezy rc1. > >(ftr) which is where i disagree, with the mentioned patch against d-i >and debian-cd, you can release d-i wheezy rc1, even with syslinux 5.x >in sid. > >even more so: since steve uses a local copy of syslinux anyway >(judging from debian-cd sources as unfortunately the setup of >debian-cd on the buildhost is not documented) when invoking >debian-cd, it doesn't matter at all what version of syslinux is in >sid.
Already corrected elsewhere (repeating for clarity for people who may not read all of the thread here) - debian-cd uses syslinux from the archive at build time. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com "Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast." Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130207095529.gc9...@einval.com