[Sven Luther]
> as iso8859-1 is called latin1, i suppose it just makes sense to name
> iso8859-15 latin15 ?

Not really.  There is almost, but not quite, a direct mapping from
ISO-8859-<n> to latin<n>.  If I recall correctly, at least ISO-8859-11
is called latin9 for historical reasons, so you can not assume a
direct mapping.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to