On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: > >> But since the ZoL (zfs and spl) isn't yet available in the archive >> (something about new packages not being accepted this year - !?), >> and the fact that some of the commits might not be very pretty, and >> some needs more talk, I was kind'a hoping someone would actually >> take a look at the commits I done and perhaps comment more on them. > > Until those packages are available in the archive (should that happen, > due to licensing concerns that might involved here, but I'm neither a > lawyer or an ftpmaster), I think it would be safer to keep all > relevant changes into a zol (or any other appropriate name) branch, > and reset the master branches to where they were before you started > pushing things. >
There is ongoing discussion with ftp-masters about licensing and patents, until we reach an agreement the package won't be uploaded. Well I'm quite confident that the result will be positive so far, :-) -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMr=8w5_X8yNpixtd94KnUzF-mydE2=bdg4_bfy6p0pj6hw...@mail.gmail.com