On 3 January 2014 10:03, Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 04:00 +0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > I don't know what ads is/was but it is armel not armhf and I think for > the most part we should just leave the subarch stuff as is on armel. (At > least for now, probably forever). >
"armhf" is a symlink to armel. I guess they are all "armish v7" and ubuntu only has armhf these days. Which does indeed look backwards when looking at the diffs =) Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANBHLUg3QS9g_DqxV4Q64fFL-q4jey=brUwVO7V3=jbwcvx...@mail.gmail.com
