Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> (2014-08-11): > retitle 757711 netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface > reassign 757711 src:netcfg > found 757711 netcfg/1.118 > severity 757711 grave > user debian-...@lists.debian.org > usertags 757711 + kfreebsd > thanks
Steve, if you want to interact with the maintainer of a package you're reassigning a bug to, you need to add the said maintainer to Cc. Otherwise the received mail only contains the results of the control commands: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2014/08/msg00215.html Now that -boot@ owns the bug report, keeping the bug report, -bsd@, and the submitter in the loop should be sufficient. Full quoting follows, for those not following -bsd@. Mraw, KiBi. > Hi, > > On 11/08/14 08:18, Jan Henke wrote: > > [...] DHCP client terminating directly after network > > detection (after receiving signal 15), which interferes later with the > > mirror selection, as there is no Internet connection then. > > More specifically, this is what I see happening: > * dhclient correctly gets a DHCP lease and correctly sets the IPv4 > address on the interface > * if it doesn't know yet what hostname to use, netcfg prompts the user > to enter one (and the DNS search domain) > * right after entering those, dhclient receives SIGTERM, gives up the > DHCP lease and deconfigures the interface. > > > Aug 11 11:12:09 netcfg[1872]: WARNING **: Started DHCP client; PID is 1919 > > Aug 11 11:12:10 dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > > interval 1 > > Aug 11 11:12:10 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST on em0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 > > Aug 11 11:12:10 dhclient: DHCPOFFER from 10.0.2.2 > > Aug 11 11:12:10 dhclient: DHCPACK from 10.0.2.2 > > Aug 11 11:12:10 dhclient: bound to 10.0.2.15 -- renewal in 41223 seconds. > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Reading domain name returned via DHCP > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: DHCP domain name is '' > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Reading nameservers from > > /etc/resolv.conf > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Read nameserver 10.0.2.3 > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: State is now 1 > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: State is now 2 > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: State is now 5 > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Using DNS to try and obtain default > > hostname > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Getting default hostname from rDNS > > lookup of autoconfigured address fe80::5054:ff:fe12:3456 > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: getnameinfo() returned -2 (Name or > > service not known) > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Getting default hostname from rDNS > > lookup of autoconfigured address 10.0.2.15 > > Aug 11 11:12:12 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: getnameinfo() returned -2 (Name or > > service not known) > ...then hostname and domain are provided... > > Aug 11 11:12:22 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: State is now 6 > > Aug 11 11:12:23 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Network config complete > > Aug 11 11:12:23 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: No interface given; clearing > > /etc/network/interfaces > > Aug 11 11:12:23 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Writing informative header > > Aug 11 11:12:23 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Success! > > Aug 11 11:12:23 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Writing loopback interface > > Aug 11 11:12:23 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Success! > > Aug 11 11:12:23 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Writing DHCP stanza for em0 > > Aug 11 11:12:23 netcfg[1872]: INFO: No hotpluggable devices are present in > > the system. > > Aug 11 11:12:23 netcfg[1872]: DEBUG: Success! > > Aug 11 11:12:23 dhclient: Received signal 15, initiating shutdown. > > Aug 11 11:12:23 dhclient: DHCPRELEASE on em0 to 10.0.2.2 port 67 > > Incriminating code is at: > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/netcfg.git/tree/dhcp.c#n617 > > Is it really intended that kill_dhcp_client will deconfigure the > interface? Why was this not a problem for wheezy d-i? Is it supposed > to be brought back up again in a later step? > > Regards, > -- > Steven Chamberlain > ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
