On 08/26/2014 10:29 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Sure: breaking reverse dependencies is a bug; a quite nasty one when > that happens in an uncoordinated and deliberately disruptive manner.
i do disgree with that interpretation which can be seen in the previous mail, but insisting on that would not get us anywhere. now, can you give me a *technical* reason why the bugreport needs to be kept open? is there a need to keep syslinux out of testing or why does it need to be kept open? -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53fcefa1.2080...@progress-technologies.net
