On 30/09/14 18:21, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> TL;DR: nack for now.
Sure, no problem. Hopefully lifting the block-udeb in the normal way
after the beta will be enough to resolve this.
> According to my fuzzy memory (and past excuses files), the root
> reason is that systemd hasn't been a candidate in a while (too
> young and/or RC buggy).
Yes, it had RC bugs for a while but they seem to have been addressed
in unstable now. It's still a bit too new though (2/5 days).
> (systemd means udev-udeb, nothing something I'd like to rush in at
> the last minute.)
I'd forgotten about udev-udeb, and yes, that's a good reason to not
rush it!
> FWIW it might be a nice idea to coordinate such requests with
> Michael since I already replied on that topic on #-release earlier
> today…
Sorry, I should have mentioned that I filed this in response to IRC
discussion with Michael (about some lower-priority dbus changes which
I didn't want uploaded until it migrates), and I had X-Debbugs-Cc'd
him in the bug report.
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/542aec0c.2020...@debian.org
