Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > Hi Niels, > > Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> (2015-06-01): > > There is an existing experimental patch series for debhelper to have it > > automatically create "ddebs"[1][2]. Currently, it /also/ happens for > > udebs, which leads me to: > > > > * Is it useful for you to have ddebs generated from udebs? > > I don't think so.
The same stands for me. Still, I haven't followed discussions about ddebs very closely : my understanding of them is probably the same than Niels' knowledge of udebs..:-). Still, I understand the basic concepts (providing debug symobols and debug "stuff" in dedicated packages in a similar way to what Ubuntu is, IIRC, doing in Launchpad). And with that understanding, I don't really see how it could be possible to use these in the D-I context. > > Please note that I have very little practical experience with udebs and > > how they are used. You are doing me a favour if you assume I know less > > about udebs than you think I do. :) > > > > * If you see no benefit in having ddebs for udebs, please do not > > hesitate to let me know. I am more than happy to disable ddebs for > > udebs. > > Please wait until some other developers have had a chance to comment, > though. ;) The same stands for me (anyone feeling like waving a magic wand to have Joeyh contributing back to D-I and dh?).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
