Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> (2015-11-27): > Cyril Brulebois, on Fri 27 Nov 2015 23:32:03 +0100, wrote: > > Are we talking about possibly moving stuff from: > > - build/tmp/netboot-gtk/ to build/tmp/netboot/gtk? > > - build/tmp/netboot-gtk/ to build/tmp/netboot-gtk/gtk? > > > > where stuff means initrd.gz (only)? > > Yes. Honestly, I don't understand why they are not in gtk/, that only > brings confusion as to whether the image is gtk-ish or not. > > > I'm not too fond of moving files around, especially since serving the > > right files from the right places is sometimes hard/long to set up; so > > I don't think you're “less than ideal” commit as you call it is too bad. > > I'm fine with keeping this special-casing, I just feel that simply > keeping gtk files in gtk/ would lead to less special-casing overall.
I meant to mention I don't feel strongly one way or the other. Having stuff where they make sense is of course a good idea. Especially so if that means fewer hacks/easier maintenance. Just wanted to emphasize that moving user-facing files/locations around has a cost, for users. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
