Martin Michlmayr <t...@cyrius.com> (2016-02-19): > * Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> [2016-02-19 11:07]: > > Until now I've been waiting for linux to be built everywhere to flip > > the switch. I'm fine with revisiting how we do things but I think it > > should be discussed somehow. > > I agree with you (unless there's one arch which takes a long time to > get fixed).
(of course) > Sorry, I was a little bit trigger happy yesterday. I thought breaking > some builds for a day or two wouldn't be a big problem, but I guess > you're the one receiving all the build errors. ;-) I have a specific monitoring for kernel bumps and d-i daily build failures indeed. I almost was trigger-happy as well, but refrained from doing so when I noticed some FTBFSes; which made it curious to get notified about d-i daily build failures a few hours after that. ;) > Anyway, I agree with your policy. Ben made a new linux upload so > hopefully all architectures will be there later today. Indeed, all green so far. I only remember one particular time (without any references whatsoever because I'm not a memory guy) where we had to wait for a few iterations since build failures were getting fixed… and other discovered, so it took a few days, maybe weeks. Anyway, back to the topic: Great, let's keep current practice. Of course, it totally makes sense to jump the gun in some cases. What I initially thought was that arm* folks were interested in recent fixes in latest linux (this seems usual because well arm*…), and it seemed odd to bump the version to depend on a linux version… that wasn't built. :) KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
