Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:41:17 +0200 with message-id <20160815044117.gf2...@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#833599: debian-installer: choose-mirror segfaults has caused the Debian Bug report #833599, regarding debian-installer: choose-mirror segfaults to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 833599: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833599 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: debian-installer Severity: grave Tags: d-i Justification: renders package unusable Hi. When using todays (and few previous days) netboot/mini.iso amd64 snapshot, I am consistently getting segfault when executing "Choose mirror to install from (menu item)" during expert install. in the dmesg: segfault at 0 ip 000000004017c0 sp 0000xxxx error 4 in choose-mirror[4000000+6000] I do not think this is related to libc6 issues reported in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740068 I had no issues with debian 8.5.0 netboot iso. Regards, Witold
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi again Witold, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2016-08-15): > Witold Baryluk <witold.bary...@gmail.com> (2016-08-09): > > < Unpacking choose-mirror-bin (2.70) ... > > < Unpacking choose-mirror (2.70) ... > > --- > > > Unpacking choose-mirror-bin (2.69) ... > > > Unpacking choose-mirror (2.69) ... > > 92c92 > > < Unpacking wpasupplicant-udeb (2.5-1) ... > > --- > > > Unpacking wpasupplicant-udeb (2.3-2.4) ... > > > > > > Which is strange. As the 2.70 only contains translation fixes. > > > > But it is possible that the compiler used or libc used was different than > > previously, which somehow manifests here. > > A new glibc upstream version migrated to testing late July, which might > have to do with the issues you're seeing. I'll be double checking this > shortly. I've tracked this down and documented the results in #834383, which I've just uploaded a fix for. I'm closing this bug report accordingly; thanks for your investigations and sorry for not getting back to you sooner. KiBi.signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---