#include <hallo.h> David Kimdon wrote on Tue Feb 19, 2002 um 10:48:22PM: > Can someone summarize what needs to be done to make boot-floppies > buildable again? > > Currently I can't satisfy 'make check'. This bug (#134045) ended up > talking about nano, but it still isn't clear to me what we need for > boot-floppies.
With the split of libslang, we need following programs which link against the .UTF-8 version. - whiptail-utf8 Ask dancerj, he forked the newt package which links against utf8-slang. - nano-tiny-utf8 - cfdisk-utf8 Patches to create both last packages are on http://people.debian.org/~blade/bf-utf8/fdisk-utf8.diff http://people.debian.org/~blade/bf-utf8/nano-utf8.diff We (me and dancerj) decided (at least it made this impression) to make new "shadow" source packages, ig. new cfdisk-utf8, nano-bf and newt-utf8 source packages, which use the original .orig.tar.gz tarballs from util-linux, nano and own diff files (same scheme as used on fetchmail<-ssl>). Gruss/Regards, Eduard. > Bug #132990 may be slang/newt related, I'd like to figure out what > libs I should be buliding with before I start debugging it. - build and upload new -utf8 packages - change EXTRACT maps to install this packages where needed. Note that we should not need this i18n-non-i18n-mixed crap longer. The disk is either completely built on -utf8, or on non-utf8 slang. - change rootdisk.sh to move the programs to the right locations, ie. moving cfdisk-utf8 to /sbin/cfdisk. BTW: does anyone know how to contact the loadlin upstream? I see that error and can reproduce another one (crc error) with kernel 2.4 on Athlon. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]