On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 08:20:52PM +0500, Baurzhan Muftakhidinov wrote: > > Should I prepare a patch for it? It is only 3 lines change.
I suppose you shouldn't. > >> WARNING: U+2116: no glyph defined Hmm, now I realise that this looks very suspicious because the numero sign is defined in most (all?) source fonts. I don't get such a message when I build the package. What does the following command output: grep '2116: no glyph defined' Fonts/*.log Anton Zinoviev
