Hi, And thanks for the ping on that topic.
Roger Shimizu <rogershim...@gmail.com> (2017-05-29): > Maybe it's too late for r0, but I'm still want to ask whether it's feasible > to include the patch mentioned here: > https://bugs.debian.org/839894#30 > > henrich provided the patch and he verified it worked well in his virtualbox > environment. I think we want to do this instead: -/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9]| +/dev/[hsv]d[a-z0-9][a-z0-9]*| since the proposed patch would allow hd,sd,vd by making the letter/number entirely optional, instead of mandatory once and optionally present a few other times? EIther way, this looks reasonable for r0, until we scratch this entirely in buster and rely on simpler code for this. KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
