Hi, Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 08:40:06AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >Holger Wansing <[email protected]> (2019-11-29): > >> Holger Wansing <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > I've noticed quite a number of updates on the l10n side in different > >> > > packages (thanks for driving those efforts, by the way!); and I've also > >> > > removed arcboot-installer (gone) and added partman-efi (despite a > >> > > comment, used for a while) to our packages list. > >> > > >> > Yes, I have just noticed the big commit done by the l10n-sync script > >> > this evenning. :-) > >> > >> Looking at this commit, I see that those strings all went to sublevel5, > >> which is defined as "for high-end (such as hppa, ia64 or s390x) and hobby > >> (m68k) arches and old stuff (partconf, partitioner, that are replaced by > >> partman > >> for a while)" > >> (taken from https://d-i.debian.org/doc/i18n-guide/ch01s04.html) > >> > >> Sublevel5 does not look correct for this, I think. > >> Those messages are supposed to appear on many systems these days, even in > >> default installs, or am I missing something? > > > >Cc-ing Steve explicitly, who should know much more than me about it. > > Oh, hmmm. Looks like I've missed this in the past... :-/ > > Yes, I'd expect partman-efi stuff to show up on *most* systems either > now, or at least in the near future.
Ok, I have trimmed the sublevel definitions accordingly then. Holger -- Holger Wansing <[email protected]> PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
