Hello, Cyril Brulebois, le mar. 30 mai 2023 21:08:45 +0200, a ecrit: > Philip Hands <p...@hands.com> (2023-05-30): > > Apparently, this MR fixes the problem: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/rootskel/-/merge_requests/8 > > > > Although this does prompt the question of why aarch64 has TERM set to > > 'vt102' at this point, rather than 'linux'. > > Glancing at the merge request earlier, my first (intertwined) questions > were: > > 1. Why is aarch64 special here? > 2. Where does that difference come from?
I'm wondering what kind of console aarch64 is using: is that the Linux virtual Terminal on an fbdev, or a ttyS console? Something else? The kernel boot logs could be useful to determine that. Samuel > 3. Which other architectures might be impacted if we were to change > that? > > > Also, I wonder whether there could be other circumstances when $TERM > > is set to 'vt102' where this change could be problematic (I'm guessing > > that the $TERM_TYPE checks deal with that, but I'm not sure). > > Yeah, that's the same kind of questions one would get by combined my > second and third questions…
